Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Arthur Rinderknech vs Evan Furness Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rinderknech vs Furness analysis and find out who is favored!
Arthur Rinderknech vs Evan Furness Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rinderknech 2 - 0 Furness
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rinderknech has won 50.71% of points on their second serve, while Furness has won 44.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rinderknech, in recent form, has won 46.97% of their opponent's second serve points, while Furness has won 51.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.87% and 36.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rinderknech has saved 65.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Furness has saved 54.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rinderknech has won 52.17% of matches played (W/L 36/ 33), with Furness winning 44.44% (W/L 12/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rinderknech has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 93/ 56), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 11/ 11). Furness has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 84/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Rinderknech has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 46.88% of matches (W/L 15/ 17), where as Furness has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 6/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rinderknech winning 2 times and Furness being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Rinderknech winning 4 and Furness winning 1. The last match between Rinderknech and Furness was at the Cherbourg Challenger, 10-02-2021, Second, I.hard with Arthur Rinderknech getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rinderknech and Furness have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rinderknech winning 1 times and Furness 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rinderknech winning 1, and Furness 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rinderknech has played against opponents with an average rank of 175.06 while Furness has played against players with an average rank of 215.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rinderknech has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Furness has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rinderknech has converted 32.91% of breakpoint opportunities, and Furness has converted 47.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
69
Rank
42
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
878
Rank
197
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
61% (284-181)
Career Total W/L
59% (288-204)
54% (19-16)
YTD W/L
44% (12-15)
$1,348,825
Career Prize Money
$5,730
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rinderknech VS Furness H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Arthur Rinderknech | Evan Furness |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 27 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 17 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:18 | 1:44:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (90/137) | 67% (101/151) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (73/90) | 64% (65/101) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (24/47) | 50% (25/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (6/19) | 23% (3/13) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (61/151) | 29% (40/137) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Rinderknech VS Furness H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats 
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Evan Furness
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
56 of
79)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
13 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 6-4 2-6 6-0 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Evan Furness
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Arthur Rinderknech | Evan Furness |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (19/16) | 44% (12/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (51/44) | 47% (28/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (493/491) | 48% (271/289) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 38% (6/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (9/4) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.7 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 339 | 56 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 100 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:16:2 | 1:34:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 186.89 | 215.78 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1927/2980) | 59% (1066/1798) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (1485/1927) | 64% (678/1066) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (534/1053) | 44% (323/732) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (77/234) | 48% (90/188) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (1064/3142) | 43% (728/1709) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (9/5) | 46% (6/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (6/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (17/31) | 44% (11/25) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 48% (10/21) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 47% (9/19) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (18/2) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (17/4) | 0% (13/0) |
Arthur Rinderknech Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
108)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
33 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 7-6(8) 1-6 0-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
108)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
33 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-7(8) 6-1 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Adam Walton
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Frances Tiafoe
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
88)
8
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
2
86%
(
37 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
114)
20
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
59%
(
69 of
117)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
58 of
69)
70%
(
32 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
32 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
35 of
117)
120
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
86)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Reymond
Player
Evan Furness
42%
(
38 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
37%
(
19 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Alexis Gautier
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
9
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
43%
(
31 of
72)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eero Vasa
Player
Evan Furness
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Evan Furness
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Evan Furness
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Evan Furness
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Rinderknech Vs Furness Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
